Wikipedia reliable source

Here is the source (without the video): Williams, Nathan (2002-11-26) Homeopathy: The Test, Horizon (BBC) Retrieved on 2007-01-26 ; youtube is probably not the best reference, but the BBC is per Wikipedia:Reliable source examples#Science article in the popular press. Table Manners C·U·T 08:24, 26 January 2008 (UTC) Hi there TableManners.

About Springer. Springer is a leading global scientific, technical and medical portfolio, providing researchers in academia, scientific institutions and corporate R&D departments with quality content through innovative information, products and services. Springer has one of the strongest STM and HSS eBook collections and archives, as well as a ...Investing.com is a financial platform and news website; one of the top three global financial websites in the world. [3] It offers market quotes, [4] information about stocks, futures, options, [5] analysis, commodities, and an economic calendar .Yet, because anyone can write a Wikipedia entry, it’s often highly stigmatized in academic communities. This latest study, however, shows that if consumed carefully, Wikipedia can be a legitimate resource. “The first step is admitting that everyone, from students to doctors, uses Wikipedia,” writes Jake Orlowitz, the head of The Wikipedia ... We recommend using ChatGPT as a source of inspiration and feedback—but not as a source of information. Below, we explain what ChatGPT does well and what kinds of things it tends to get wrong. We also explore why its responses aren’t always reliable and look at the best ways to use it responsibly.Table of Contents. Discovering Wikipedia; a collective effort; Still, is it possible to cite Wikipedia as a reliable source? A community born of credibility ...

At ThoughtCo, we believe that great inspiration begins with a question, and we help 13 million users answer theirs every month. Whether yours is about science and math, humanities and religion, or architecture and the arts, our in-depth articles, written by literature writers, Ph.D.s, and experienced instructors, are designed to give you the …The overall completeness of drug information in Wikipedia was 83.8±1.5% (p<0.001).”. They concluded that “Wikipedia is an accurate and comprehensive source of drug-related information for undergraduate medical education.”. It is nearly impossible to analyze when it comes to bias, as each entry changes frequently and is edited by people ...Wikipedia articles should be based on reliable, published sources, making sure that all majority and significant minority views that have appeared in those sources are covered (see Wikipedia:Neutral point of view). If no reliable sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article on it.Wikipedia articles should be based on reliable, published secondary sources, and to a lesser extent, on tertiary sources and primary sources. Secondary or tertiary sources are needed to establish the topic's notability and avoid novel interpretations of primary sources.The overall completeness of drug information in Wikipedia was 83.8±1.5% (p<0.001).”. They concluded that “Wikipedia is an accurate and comprehensive source of drug-related information for undergraduate medical education.”. It is nearly impossible to analyze when it comes to bias, as each entry changes frequently and is edited by people ...JSTOR. JSTOR is an online library of all kinds of sources, such as books, articles, and journals. Even though access is limited, it can be a great help for students. It is also considered one of the most reliable databases since the sources are selected very carefully before being placed there. Microsoft Academic.WW wiki is not a reliable source - Wikipedia Wikipedia is not a reliable source for citations elsewhere on Wikipedia. Because it can be edited by anyone at any ...

Overview. Wikipedia has articles about every topic you can imagine — from Taylor Swift to “toast sandwiches,” among the online encyclopedia’s 6.6 million articles. But that trove of ...accuracy reliability Recommended Dependence solely on Wikipedia for information can be a risky endeavour and highlights the importance of cross-referencing …BitChute is an alt-tech video hosting service launched by Ray Vahey in January 2017. It describes itself as offering freedom of speech, while the service is known for hosting far-right individuals, conspiracy theorists, and hate speech. Some creators who use BitChute have been banned from YouTube; some others crosspost content to both platforms or post …TimidGuy ( talk) 16:05, 8 March 2008 (UTC) TG: 1 - there are no scholarly, peer reviewed research papers that say that that members of cults have a low, high or "normal" "field independence/depend ce" score. This is a psychometric test used, mainly, in …This is an explanatory essay about the the Wikipedia:Reliable sources guideline. Wikipedia's policies or guidelines thoroughly vetted by the community. Reliable sources must be able to be verified. This does not mean that any particular person at any given moment must be capable of verifying them.Yet, because anyone can write a Wikipedia entry, it’s often highly stigmatized in academic communities. This latest study, however, shows that if consumed carefully, Wikipedia can be a legitimate resource. “The first step is admitting that everyone, from students to doctors, uses Wikipedia,” writes Jake Orlowitz, the head of The Wikipedia ...

Wsu football tickets 2022.

Kingdom of Simien has been listed as a level-5 vital article in History. If you can improve it, please do. This article has been rated as Start-Class by WikiProject Vital Articles. This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethiopia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ethiopia on Wikipedia.If the website or page to which you want to link includes information that is not yet a part of the article, consider using it as a source for the article, and citing it. Guidelines for sourcing, which include external links used as citations, are discussed at Wikipedia:Reliable sources and Wikipedia:Citing sources.This list summarizes prior consensus and consolidates links to the most in-depth and recent discussions from the reliable sources noticeboard and elsewhere on Wikipedia. Context matters tremendously, and some sources may or may not be suitable for certain uses depending on the situation.For example, Wikipedia:Reliable sources says newspaper articles are generally considered to be reliable sources, and Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) recommends against newspaper articles for certain technical purposes. Editors must use their best judgement to decide which advice is most appropriate and relevant to the specific ...Are you a pet owner looking for a convenient and reliable source for all your pet needs? Look no further than Chewy.com’s official site. One of the standout features of Chewy.com’s official site is its unparalleled product selection.Reuters using Wikipedia as a source does not make Wikipedia a reliable source generally. WP:V : "The burden of evidence lies with the editor who adds or restores material.", so if someone can cite that YA is a RS, or that the tabloid article for Chabad-Lubavitch article is a RS that would be a start.

One place to look for additional sources to use in assessing the quality of a Wikipedia article is to look at the sources it cites. An article that faithfully reflects the information and intent of a large number of high quality sources is likely to be a very reliable indicator of the current state of knowledge on a subject.The Ancient History Encyclopedia was founded in 2009 by van der Crabben with the stated goal of improving history education worldwide by creating a freely accessible and reliable history source. The nonprofit organization is based in Godalming , United Kingdom and Montreal , Canada , although it has no office and its team is globally distributed.The Ancient History Encyclopedia was founded in 2009 by van der Crabben with the stated goal of improving history education worldwide by creating a freely accessible and reliable history source. The nonprofit organization is based in Godalming , United Kingdom and Montreal , Canada , although it has no office and its team is globally distributed.This is a project to work towards guidelines for History-related articles equivalent to those about reliable sources for medical articles.. History articles should always comply with the major content policies: Wikipedia:Verifiability, Wikipedia:No original research, and Wikipedia:Neutral point of view.It may be helpful to consult the essay …Reliability of Wikipedia compared to other academic research sources. Wikipedia is often considered less reliable than other academic research sources due to the following …Take, for example, the one so called "reliable source" that was cited as grounds for calling the project dormant, which is from September 2014. That's a year out of date and completely irrelevant, and absolutely should not be considered to trump a much more recent primary source. Sprhodes 15:37, 17 September 2015 (UTC) ReplyMain page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Donate; Help; Learn to edit; Community portal; Recent changes; Upload fileView _711548.docx from COMMUNICAT UCU 100 at Kenyatta University. Surname 1 Student's Name Professor's Name Course Date Digital Media Wikipedia d.

Here I’ve compiled a simple list of seven examples of unreliable essay sources which you should avoid referencing at all costs. These are sources that are not credible or reliable sources for essays. 1. Wikipedia. Okay, so here’s the deal. Read Wikipedia. Your friends do, your competitors do, and even your teachers do.

accuracy reliability Recommended Dependence solely on Wikipedia for information can be a risky endeavour and highlights the importance of cross-referencing …Jan 24, 2011 · Numerous studies have rated Wikipedia's accuracy. On the whole, the web encyclopedia is fairly reliable, but Life's Little Mysteries own small investigation produced mixed results. A reliable source is one that provides a thorough, well-reasoned theory, argument, discussion, ... Wikipedia editors will post warnings if they think the entry has weaknesses. Wikipedia entries tend to be conservative, reflecting traditional views over newer research. Next: ...Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Donate; Help; Learn to edit; Community portal; Recent changes; Upload fileBecause they are not wikipedia reliable sources. It's just ethnic boosterism. Mohummy 01:52, 9 September 2009 (UTC) Reply Stars of Science is an initiative and a program by the "Qatar Foundation for Education, Science and Community Development" and "Education City". Their flagship project is "Education City" of which, "Academic Bridge Program, …So, to summarize, it is true that Wikipedia is not a reliable source in academic circles. However, this does not have to mean that you can’t use it if you’re smart about it. Now that the reliability debate on Wikipedia is settled, once and for all, we can move on to the next part – how to effectively use Wikipedia for academic research …Reuters using Wikipedia as a source does not make Wikipedia a reliable source generally. WP:V : "The burden of evidence lies with the editor who adds or restores material.", so if someone can cite that YA is a RS, or that the tabloid article for Chabad-Lubavitch article is a RS that would be a start.That said, Wikipedia entries are generally at the forefront of any web research. They can be great sources for preliminary information on a topic and finding reliable sources through their notes, references, external links, and further reading sections. Here's how you can use Wikipedia for your research: Getting background informationAccording to the latest official figures, there are Wikipedia sites in 300 different languages, with some 46 million articles accessed by 1.4 billion unique devices every single month, while an ...

Fee for service business model.

Buy here pay here gallatin.

Jimmy Wales' Wikipedia comes close to Britannica in terms of the accuracy of its science entries, a Nature investigation finds. &nbsp;UPDATE: see details of how the data were collected for this ...The best kind of sources for Wikipedia are reliable, third-party sources (not published by or related to the subject of the article). Wikipedia:Help with sources has more information about these and why they are needed. Unfortunately, the Simple English Wikipedia has many articles which do not have these kinds of sources, or in fact any sources ... Remember, this checklist is useful to identify whether a source is likely to be appropriate for general use in an average article. No source is always unreliable for every statement, and no source is always reliable for any statement. A source can only be considered reliable when the source's qualities are compared against the qualities editors ...Please refer to Wikipedia:reliable source. The Findings cannot be used as a reliable source or reference to this article. Also please familiarise yourself with the discussion about reliable sources, proposals and resolutions which were passed by the first and second arbitration commitee. :: ...Reliable sources, generally, are third-party published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. The best sources have a professional structure in place for checking or analyzing facts, legal issues, evidence, and arguments. The greater the degree of scrutiny given to these issues, the more reliable the source.Running is an increasingly popular form of exercise, and with the right gear, it can be an enjoyable and rewarding experience. That’s why it’s important to have a reliable source for all your running needs. Running Warehouse is that source.It cannot be the case that publication or exposition per se makes a source unreservably reliable - what you are saying is that first hand evidence is less reliable than second hand reporting and, Bill Huffman, if that is your creed, I suggest you hand back your degree along with Wikipedia's credibility.81.152.237.116 16:48, 8 April 2007 (UTC)Barrie Blake-ColemanOct 16, 2023 · The overall completeness of drug information in Wikipedia was 83.8±1.5% (p<0.001).”. They concluded that “Wikipedia is an accurate and comprehensive source of drug-related information for undergraduate medical education.”. It is nearly impossible to analyze when it comes to bias, as each entry changes frequently and is edited by people ... Wikipedia the free online encyclopedia has been a major problem in school systems today. Professors and students argue that the site is and is not a credible source for research papers. Wikipedia shouldn’t be trusted enough to be a credible source in someone’s school research paper, but instead more of a general starting point for you to …SourceForge is a web service that offers software consumers a centralized online location to control and manage open-source software projects and research business software. It provides source code repository hosting, bug tracking, mirroring of downloads for load balancing, a wiki for documentation, developer and user mailing lists, user-support … ….

For example, Wikipedia:Reliable sources says newspaper articles are generally considered to be reliable sources, and Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) recommends against newspaper articles for certain technical purposes. Editors must use their best judgement to decide which advice is most appropriate and relevant to the specific ... In Wikipedia, verifiability means that people reading and editing the encyclopedia can check that information comes from a reliable source. No original research – Wikipedia does not publish original thought: all material in Wikipedia must be attributable to a reliable, published source. Articles may not contain any new analysis or synthesis ... Wikipedia covers a huge range of subjects, but as anybody can add or change ... They are a reliable source of information, having been written by authors ...Per Wikipedia:Reliable source examples#Religious sources, religious sources may be accepted as a source for their own views, and such personal views should be presented in accordance with WP:RSOPINION. Religious scripture is a primary source and should be avoided per WP:PRIMARY, except for direct quotations. For everything else (history, …However, it is very highly regarded as a Wikipedia "reliable source," which is my point. Initial hostility towards my inclusion of the side effects reported by the class action-eers came from you, and you made a point of "reliable sources." Your consistent position seems to be to defend Mirena right-or-wrong, "reliable" source or no.This list summarizes prior consensus and consolidates links to the most in-depth and recent discussions from the reliable sources noticeboard and elsewhere on Wikipedia. Context matters tremendously, and some sources may or may not be suitable for certain uses depending on the situation.Here is the source (without the video): Williams, Nathan (2002-11-26) Homeopathy: The Test, Horizon (BBC) Retrieved on 2007-01-26 ; youtube is probably not the best reference, but the BBC is per Wikipedia:Reliable source examples#Science article in the popular press. Table Manners C·U·T 08:24, 26 January 2008 (UTC) Hi there TableManners.View _711548.docx from COMMUNICAT UCU 100 at Kenyatta University. Surname 1 Student's Name Professor's Name Course Date Digital Media Wikipedia d.Wikipedia doesn’t require any credentials or experience to edit. This means anyone with an internet connection can edit and add content. Many Wikipedia editors are fueled by passion and hidden agendas, not a desire to create unbiased coverage. 3 Reasons why Wikipedia is not a reliable source: Wikipedia’s editing structure; Lack of fact-checking Wikipedia reliable source, [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1]